Hi Yani, On Wed, 4 May 2005 23:29:47 -0400, Yani Ioannou <yani.ioannou at gmail.com> wrote: > It was decided presenting the >specific information per file was a much simpler and more sensible >interface. I tend to agree. Okay, I see that. also did a 'cat <eeprom>' oops, pipe through xxd 'cos it returned binary data :) >> Secondly is there a design document I've missed for this? What does >> dynamic sysfs look like to user? sub-directory per device/block or >> in the same directory level namespace? I damaged the patches somewhere, >> one didn't apply so couldn't 'see' it yet. > >This patch just changes the way device attributes are created, it does >not change the external sysfs interface at all. Okay <snip> Okay, I'm an interested observer then, 'cos I make cross-reference script to see which driver uses what sysfs name, still learning. Thanks, --Grant.
