Hi Khali, Philip, On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:32:39 +0200 (CEST), "Jean Delvare" <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote: > I would have gone for fanN_ppr for something shorter. I'll do it this way, the long name was for comment :) Any driver may choose to include the fanN_ppr accessor so that correct reading in rpm available from sysfs? Or is that going too far again? >think I remember a Linux 2.4 driver using that name already. >At any rate, the name fanN_ripple doesn't sound good to me. Ripple always struck me as an odd name too. >Note that such patches can only be accepted in Linux 2.6 if an equivalent >patch is provided for libsensors. I've done that before, do you want the old name kept like last time too? Cheers, Grant.
