G'day Rudolf, On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:52:40 +0100 (CET), you wrote: >Hello, > >FYI how planned documentation will look like (really soon) >http://ssh.cz/~ruik/chips_doc2 Looks good, lots of examples to follow. >It looks quite ok to me but do we really need so much info about internal >registers? Is this information hard to find out? Correct, the register info is for my own reference and can go. >I think it is relevant when you "destilate" information from different PDF >or chips (I think you did this on some place). > >Please can you fix the documentation so it follows same or nearly same >design? Certainly, to do list: Summarise common chip features, point out important chip differences. Manufacturer datasheets available for detailed information. >Please remove .txt ok >Please follow our standart format. ref: http://ssh.cz/~ruik/chips_doc2 for style/format examples >Is approx with dot better ? approx. take care with abbreviations >Do we really need such detailed info? remove register detail section, no point duplicating datasheet :) Thank you, Grant.
