OK here's the latest. It looks like we are making progress.
Now when I scan the ISA bus, I get this:
Probing for `Winbond W83627EHF'
Trying address 0x0290... Success!
(confidence 8, driver `to-be-written')
Then under Super I/O sensors:
Probing for `Winbond W83627EHF Super IO Sensors'
Success... found at address 0x0290
But under Secondary Super I/O:
Probing for `Winbond W83627EHF Super IO Sensors'
Failed! (skipping family)
And the summary shows:
Driver `to-be-written' (should be inserted):
Detects correctly:
* ISA bus address 0x0290 (Busdriver `i2c-isa')
Chip `Winbond W83627EHF Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)
David
--- Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> > I'm sorry, I didn't know I was dumping all this on a mailing list.
> >
> > If you would rather work with me one-on-one for this, let me know.
>
> No, CCing the list is alright, so that people can follow the
> advancement
> of our investigation, and also because the list is archived so later
> people will be able to know all the details they may need, even if I
> am
> no more here. And also because people can see things I miss, and tell
> me
> :)
>
> That said, you just have to post to the list once. Having it both as
> To:
> and CC: like you just did is probably too much ;)
>
> Back to our business:
> > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f
> > (...)
> > 50: ff ff 00 ff ff ff 00 80 88 20 ff ff 19 a4 ff 05
>
> ID register is 0x58, value is 0x88. The datasheet advertises 0xA1. I
> start wondering if there is anything true in this datasheet ;)
>
> Anyway, I updated the sensors-detect script with 0x88:
>
http://www2.lm-sensors.nu/%7Elm78/cvs/lm_sensors2/prog/detect/sensors-detect
>
> It should now find the chip at ISA address 0x290, hopefully.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jean Delvare
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
