Hi Michael, Quoting myself: > I'll apply your patch, thanks. On second thought, I think that the patch could be improved a bit: 1* You hide SENSORS_ERR_PROC errors for all channels, but I guess only some of them can actually be missing with the 2.6 driver? 2* You return the exact same error message for the two possible causes of failure (sensors_get_label_and_valid failing and sensors_get_feature failing). Now that you separated the "if" statements, it would be better to have different error messages. Care to send an updated patch? Thanks, -- Jean Delvare
