On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 03:15:14AM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > P. S.: struct mv64xxx_i2c_data revisited... > > > + uint state; > > + ulong reg_base_p; > > Silly request, but... Maybe this should be changed to plain old "unsigned int" > and "unsigned long". Please. I just don't understand why people use "uint", > "u_int", "uInt", "UINT", "uINT", "uint_t" which are always typedef'ed to > "unsigned int". Not a silly request at all. Please use the u32, u64 and so on values instead. That way we know what you mean, and it's portable. thanks, greg k-h
