On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 04:37:04PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Greg, > > IT87xxF chips were never seen at any other I2C address than the default > (0x2d) so I think that we could safely reduce the range of addresses the > it87 drivers accepts. Currently it accepts 0x20-0x2f, I believe that > 0x28-0x2f would already be more than sufficient. > > (In theory, any address is possible, so whatever range we choose is > arbitrary anyway.) > > Please apply, Applied, thanks. greg k-h
