Hi Jean
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 06:41:19PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hmm, wouldn't it more efficient to multiply all "mult" constants by 10
> directly?
Indeed, you're right. So here we go:
--- fscpos.c-orig 2005-01-20 03:49:05.000000000 +0100
+++ fscpos.c 2005-01-20 18:44:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -244,19 +244,19 @@
static ssize_t show_volt_12(struct device *dev, char *buf)
{
struct fscpos_data *data = fscpos_update_device(dev);
- return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[0], 1420));
+ return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[0], 14200));
}
static ssize_t show_volt_5(struct device *dev, char *buf)
{
struct fscpos_data *data = fscpos_update_device(dev);
- return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[1], 660));
+ return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[1], 6600));
}
static ssize_t show_volt_batt(struct device *dev, char *buf)
{
struct fscpos_data *data = fscpos_update_device(dev);
- return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[2], 330));
+ return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", VOLT_FROM_REG(data->volt[2], 3300));
}
/* Watchdog */
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20050120/c10b535b/attachment.bin
