On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 10:33:53AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > The names you pick are confusing. Bus drivers are modules too. BUSES and > CHIPS would be better. > Agreed. However, I wonder why things were done that way in the first > place. Were we following some Red Hat standard? I have no Red Hat-like > system to verify that. If there is no standard to follow, any code > simplification is welcome. Don't know about history, but currently Red Hat uses this format. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20041207/09792346/attachment.bin
