On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 14:33 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 10:31:12AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 01:02, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Hi Evgeniy, > > > > Hello, Adrian. > > Hi Evgeniy, > > > > drivers/w1/Makefile in recent 2.6 kernels contains: > > > obj-$(CONFIG_W1_DS9490) += ds9490r.o > > > ds9490r-objs := dscore.o > > > > > > Is there a reason, why dscore.c isn't simply named ds9490r.c ? > > > > dscore.c is a core function set to work with ds2490 chip. > > ds9490* is built on top of it. > > Any vendor can create it's own w1 bus master using this chip, > > not ds9490. > > if it was built on top of it, I'd have expected ds9490r.o to contain > additional object files. DS9490 does not have anything except this chip and simple 64bit memory chip, so it is not needed to have any additional code. > How would a different w1 bus master chip look like in > drivers/w1/Makefile? obj-m: proprietary_module.o proprietary_module-objs: dscore.o proprietary_module_init.o Actually it will live outside the kernel tree, but will require ds2490 driver. It could be called ds2490.c but I think dscore is better name. > > Evgeniy Polyakov > > cu > Adrian > -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20041122/b9a99c1c/attachment.bin
