Quoting Mark D. Studebaker: > Khali and I discussed this at length this weekend on IRC. > We agree on a general direction toward a generic implementation, > modeled in part on i2c-virtual. True :) > In the meantime, we agree that his i2c-amd756-4882 module is > straightforward is headed in the right direction, and is acceptable > for 2.6; so I no longer object to his patch. Greg, please apply the patch then, unless you have personal objections. (I may resend it with a Signed-off-by line if you want, or just add it yourself.) > In the near future I'll be working on cleaning up the original > i2c-virtual implmementation. Sounds good. Maybe you can work on this with Mark M. Hoffman since he seems to be interested as well. Thanks. -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/
