> > Mark, does this second approach please you more than my original > > one? The changes to the original file are reduced to their minimal > > form. > > Heh, OK. Could you just make sure that 'touch i2c-amd756-s4882.c' > causes make to rebuild the object? I think the auto dependency magic > will figure that out, but I'm not sure. Yes, it works properly. Thanks for pointing the potential issue out, I admit I didn't consider the problem. -- Jean Delvare http://khali.linux-fr.org/
