correct. see CVS comments for revision 1.25. Jean Delvare wrote: > On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:11:12 +0200 (CEST), Rudolf Marek wrote > >>on the http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/supported.html >>is written that vt8231 is supported by via686a which is wrong >>I think because: >>http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg18590.html >> >>A user with epia v10000 board tried >>modprobe i2c-isa >>modprobe via686a >>and it was not working ( no driver has been registered) >>nothing in logs, sysfs mounted. >> >>Please fix the table or tell me what I missed thanks :) > > > I think you're right and the table is wrong. The VT8231 has its own driver > named (aha!) vt8231. I guess that the via686a driver was originally supporting > both and then a fork occured and we forgot to update the page. Mark > (Studebaker), do you confirm? > > The web page sure needs fixing. >
