lm_sensors ain't updating cpu temp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



W li?cie z pon, 30-08-2004, godz. 13:25, Jean Delvare pisze: 
> Usually in /var/log, in files named syslog, messages and/or debug. Exact names
> and contents depend on the distribution. You can also watch the kernel log
> buffer by running "dmesg".

what should I look for?

> > Here's the sample output :
> > 
> > w83697hf-isa-0290
> > Adapter: ISA adapter
> > VCore:     +1.79 V  (min =  +1.71 V, max =  +1.89 V)
> > +3.3V:     +3.30 V  (min =  +3.14 V, max =  +3.46 V)
> > +5V:       +4.76 V  (min =  +4.73 V, max =  +5.24 V)       ALARM
> > +12V:     +12.65 V  (min = +10.82 V, max = +13.19 V)
> > -12V:     -12.85 V  (min = -13.18 V, max = -10.88 V)
> > -5V:       -5.55 V  (min =  -5.25 V, max =  -4.75 V)       ALARM
> > V5SB:      +5.48 V  (min =  +4.73 V, max =  +5.24 V)
> > VBat:      +3.25 V  (min =  +2.40 V, max =  +3.60 V)
> > fan1:     4245 RPM  (min =   -1 RPM, div = 2)              ALARM
> > fan2:        0 RPM  (min = 5273 RPM, div = 2)              ALARM
> > temp1:       +39?C  (high =    +0?C, hyst =  +105?C)   sensor =
> > thermistor   ALARM
> > temp2:     +53.5?C  (high =  +120?C, hyst =  +115?C)   sensor =
> > thermistor
> 
> OK, it looks rather good overall. If I understand what you first said
> correctly, temp1 is changing, but temp2 isn't and will always read 53.5 degrees?

As I wrote in another mail (maybe he didn't get to the list) it usually
looks like that: temp1 +39C and temp2 +29C. Of course it begins with
temp1 smaller that temp2. The sample I've sent you done after a couple
of hours running and after a reboot. When I reboot the temp2 is updated
but it seems that it is updated only during bootup.

> What are the brand and model name of your motherboard?

I believe it is Jetway V266B.

> > I was told that the latest stable kernel version for mandrake10.0
> > official is 2.6.3-15mdk (once again: I'm a newbie) so I don't believe
> > that the upgrade could change something.
> 
> It's hard to say. Mandrake may have been backporting patches. After all, there
> must be differences and improvements, or there would not be new kernel
> packages released. Do you know if a list of the changes exists?

Sorry, I don't know of any list of changes.

> I also think I remember that there are alternative, semi-official kernel
> packages for Mandrake. It may only be for Cooker and not for 10.0 though. And
> it may not be the easiest thing to try if you're just starting with Linux.

I was told that the newer ones are for cooker.
-- 
Cezary Morga <cezarym at pf.pl>
Registered Linux User No. 362185 <http://counter.li.org>
GG# 169903 ICQ# 328-700-565 Jabber: thereidos at ebox.pl



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux