preferred submission method for updated kernel 2.6.X lm85 driver?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Justin actually works *for* me...  So I'm OK with his work.

:v)

Jean Delvare wrote:

>>I have been busy porting forward the fancontrol bits in the lm85
>>driver to the 2.6.X kernel (and associated /sys/bus/...) architecture.
>> There is a
>>great deal of rewritten code since I tried to make it fit reasonably
>>well with the most recent fan control model.
>>
>>With so much rewritten code, would it be just as well to submit the
>>entire driver code to the list, or is a patch still preferrable?
>>    
>>
>
>Patche_s_ are still prefered. Split the changes in as many patches as
>necessary so that each patch is understable and, if possible, applyable
>by itself.
>
>It would be great if Philip Pokorny could review your work, since he
>wrote the original driver and also reviewed the auto-fan proposals.
>
>Thanks.
>
>  
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux