[PATCH] I2C update for 2.6.8-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is this right that we don't want to explicitly initialize the adm1031_id 
counter?

Why is that?
:v)

Greg KH wrote:

>diff -Nru a/drivers/i2c/chips/adm1031.c b/drivers/i2c/chips/adm1031.c
>--- a/drivers/i2c/chips/adm1031.c	2004-07-14 16:59:33 -07:00
>+++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/adm1031.c	2004-07-14 16:59:33 -07:00
>  
>
 >  [snip]

> 
>-static int adm1031_id = 0;
>+static int adm1031_id;
>+
>  
>

-- 
Philip Pokorny, Director of Engineering
Tel: 415-954-2823   Fax: 415-954-2899   Toll Free: 888-PENGUIN
PENGUIN COMPUTING, INC.
www.penguincomputing.com



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux