Hi Jean:
* Jean Delvare <khali at linux-fr.org> [2004-07-02 23:55:08 +0200]:
> OK, I reworked both the LM75 and the LM77 detection routines to take
> benefit of that singularity. It should make detection of these chips
> quite reliable now.
>
> Andras, Mark, can you please test again? Confidence 6 is expected. Mark,
> please fake the LM77 address range again, so that the test is even more
> interesting.
Confidence 6 as expected on the lm75s, and lm77 was (correctly) not
detected. I used this:
Index: sensors-detect
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/lm_sensors2/prog/detect/sensors-detect,v
retrieving revision 1.332
diff -u -r1.332 sensors-detect
--- sensors-detect 2 Jul 2004 22:01:17 -0000 1.332
+++ sensors-detect 2 Jul 2004 22:22:11 -0000
@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@
{
name => "National Semiconductor LM77",
driver => "lm77",
- i2c_addrs => [0x48..0x4b],
+ i2c_addrs => [0x48..0x4d],
i2c_detect => sub { lm77_detect @_},
},
{
Regards,
--
Mark M. Hoffman
mhoffman at lightlink.com
