>> You may try the following command: >> >> isaset -f 0x6627 0x02 >> >> It'll increase the sampling rate (at the cost of power consumption, I >> suppose). You can revert to the old speed at any time using: >> >> isaset -f 0x6627 0x00 >> >> Let me know if it changes anything. > >It did have rather interesting results: >pc87366-isa-6620 >Adapter: ISA adapter >in0: +2.95 V (min = +0.00 V, max = 2.95 V) >in1: +2.24 V (min = +1.18 V, max = 1.45 V) ALARM >in2: +2.78 V (min = +0.00 V, max = 2.95 V) >in3: +0.79 V (min = +0.00 V, max = 2.95 V) >in4: +2.76 V (min = +0.00 V, max = 2.95 V) >in5: +2.77 V (min = +1.27 V, max = 1.55 V) ALARM >in6: +0.00 V (min = +1.18 V, max = 1.45 V) ALARM >Vsb: +3.66 V (min = +2.99 V, max = 3.59 V) ALARM >Vdd: +3.66 V (min = +2.99 V, max = 3.59 V) ALARM >Vbat: +2.95 V (min = +2.40 V, max = 2.95 V) >AVdd: +3.64 V (min = +2.99 V, max = 3.59 V) ALARM >temp4: +5 C (low = -0 C, high = +85 C) >temp4_crit: > -9 C >temp5: +11 C (low = -0 C, high = +85 C) >temp5_crit: > -9 C > >These readings seem to hold steady, regardless of how rapidly I run the >sensors program. They return to "normal" when I revert the change. Intersting, except that these can't possibly be the temperature of you system, can it? Have you tried to give your system some work, to see if the values increase or decrease? I seriously suspect that, if these really are thermistors, they are positive coeff ones (as opposed to the common use). Could you try editing the temp4 and temp5 compute lines? Just replace 3435 with (-3435) everywhere it appears. It'll probably break limits, but it's just a test. I wonder if temperature readings will look any better. I guess I can't insist enough on the fact that hearing from Soekris on what is on the board would be welcome ;) Thanks, Jean Delvare
