Well, I should have seen it, so consider me a stoopid as well :-)
root at pathfinder eric # i2cdump 0 0x4e
No size specified (using byte-data access)
WARNING! This program can confuse your I2C bus, cause data loss and worse!
I will probe file /dev/i2c-0, address 0x4e, mode byte
You have five seconds to reconsider and press CTRL-C!
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 0123456789abcdef
00: 6d 2d 10 72 00 80 0f 00 00 00 ff 00 00 00 e0 ff m-?r.??.......?.
10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
40: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
50: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
60: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
f0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
Jean Delvare wrote:
>Quoting Eric <plukje at gmx.net>:
>
>
>>About the version I used, I couldn't find a version number in
>>sensors-detect
>>
>
>We don't include any version in it because it would be a real pain to
>update it with each new release.
>
>
>>but I'm fairly sure this is 2.8.5 (from sensors --version) or
>>better.
>>
>
>So you did the right thing, this was the right way to get the
>information :)
>
>
>>root at pathfinder eric # i2cdump 0 0x2e
>>
>
>OK, I am too stupid. This was "i2cdump 0 0x4e", since the mysterious
>chip is as 0x04e.
>
>
