> > I just noticed that I am doing something wrong in the i2c chip
> > drivers I ported to Linux 2.6. If these drivers are forced to a
> > specific chip type("kind" as we call it internally), then the device
> > doesn't have its name set (and defaults to an empty string).
>
> Nice catch.
You probably meant "shame on you" ;) I actually thought I was smarter
that other chip driver authors and tried doing things differently...
Turned out to be a bad idea.
I'm lucky that the missed path wasn't leading to anything critical.
--
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
