> Am I reading this wrong? It looks to me like driver.attach_adapter,
> int ddcmon_attach_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> is always called when a bus is going to be probed.
>
> Most of the drivers implement it like this:
> int ddcmon_attach_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
> {
> return i2c_detect(adapter, &addr_data, ddcmon_detect);
> }
>
> It's then i2c_detect() that goes and looks for the devices and decides
> to call ddcmon_detect(); I see that ddcmon_detect() will not be called
> if none of the devices are present.
>
> So the wakeup function can be added to the attach_adapter code. Isn't
> the whole point of the attach_adapter function to allow the
> implementation of a custom probing function?
Hm, you have to be right here. It has become so usual that these
function don't contain real code that I forgot that one could put
something there, sorry.
--
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
