On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 09:45:38PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > BTW I am about to build new kernels for FC1 (2.4.22 & lots of > > backports based) and would like to include 2.8.5 (currently at 2.8.2), > > will you provide an i2c patch for it again? :) > > To anyone else I'd have replied "no way, I'm busy". But since this is > you... I just updated the files, go pick them and tell me how it goes :) Thanks a lot! Rebuilding kernels, lm_sensors and kernel modules for all other projects took me quite some time, but now there is the latest FC1 kernel with patched in lm_sensors/i2c 2.8.4 as well as lm_sensors 2.8.4 userland bits (and external kernel modules, but they are probably redundant) available at http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/name/kernel/ http://atrpms.physik.fu-berlin.de/name/lm_sensors/ (there is still the dmi_broken resolving issue I will comment on another thread) > > (...) > > If you are referring to the kernel-i2c versioning scheme, the > > kernel-drm dependeny to XFree86 has been the patron of the above > > suggestion ;) > > I guess we might consider it then... However, I still want to keep in > sync (sort of) with Linux 2.6 for now. Once the rush is behind us, > maybe... > > That said, we better start with not creating unneeded dependencies with > IDs, as MDS suggested. And keeping the docs accurate too. This should > already make your life a bit easier. > > Feel free to come back with your suggestion within a few months, in case > we forget about it and you're still interested. I will remind you :) -- Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040224/b7fa4182/attachment.bin
