> I would like to further suggest the renaming of 'sensor<n>' to > 'temp<n>_sensor' or 'temp<n>_type', in the interest of being > consistent. Correct. I was precisely thinking of something similar :) For the sake of completeness, here is the list of renames that I plan to do: temp<n>_hyst -> temp<n>_max_hyst or temp<n>_crit_hyst sensor<n> -> temp<n>_type pwm<n> -> fan<n>_pwm pwm<n>_enable -> fan<n>_pwm_enable vid -> in<n>_ref I think that this should define a self-explanatory and easily extendable interface. There are a few "technical" terms remaining (in, pwm, vrm), but since these are the words used in the sensors domain, I feel like we better keep them as they are. Thanks a lot for your constructive comment, I appreciate that. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
