Mark M. Hoffman wrote: > Hi Paolo: > > (cc'ed to sensors mailing list...) > > * Paolo Cesare BERVA <paolo.berva at st.com> [2004-02-18 08:22:27 +0100]: > >>Hi Mark, here the tests I did with kernel 2.6.2: > > > <snip> > >># setpci -s 00:02.0 0x40 >>98 >># setpci -s 00:02.0 0x40=0xd8 >> >># lspci -H1 -n | grep "00:02.0" >>00:02.0 Class 0601: 1039:0018 >># setpci -s 00:02.0 0x40=0x98 >> >># lspci -H1 -n | grep "00:02.0" >>00:02.0 Class 0601: 1039:0008 > > > Excellent, that's just as I expected. > > >>Mark M. Hoffman wrote: > > > <snip> > >>>You are missing device 1039:0016 here. I think I understand >>>why, but I want to make sure. I asked another user to take >>>some further steps, but he never responded. >>> >>>You can find the steps here: >>> >>>http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg06132.html >>> >>>Everything starting from "With kernel 2.6, the driver" applies >>>to you. If you could please follow those steps and send the >>>results, then next I will send a patch to test. > > > So here's the patch vs. 2.6.3. When you build it, select > eeprom as a module (and of course i2c-sis96x). Please try > it, and send me the results of a few commands... > > lspci -n (again) > modprobe i2c-sis96x > modprobe eeprom > sensors > > If none of that seems to work, then please send the results > of 'dmesg'. Hi Mark, applied the patch and rebuilt the kernel, here the results: # uname -a Linux localhost 2.6.3 #1 Fri Feb 20 00:02:27 CET 2004 i686 GNU/Linux # lspci -n 00:00.0 Class 0600: 1039:0735 (rev 01) 00:01.0 Class 0604: 1039:0001 00:02.0 Class 0601: 1039:0018 00:02.1 Class 0c05: 1039:0016 00:02.2 Class 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 07) 00:02.3 Class 0c03: 1039:7001 (rev 07) 00:02.5 Class 0101: 1039:5513 (rev d0) 00:0f.0 Class 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10) 00:11.0 Class 0401: 1274:5880 (rev 02) 01:00.0 Class 0300: 10de:0110 (rev b2) # modprobe i2c-sis96x # modprobe eeprom # sensors eeprom-i2c-0-50 Adapter: SiS96x SMBus adapter at 0x0c00 Memory type: DDR SDRAM DIMM Memory size (MB): 512 Thank you Paolo
