Hi all, i2cdetect -l is broken on drivers which handle more than a single i2c bus (radeonfb in my case). It'll print the same name for all busses, and shouldn't. I took a look at the sysfs tree and I couldn't find any way to correct it. The fact that i2c-adapters and i2c-devs don't use the same numbering policy doesn't give us much chance. As far as I can tell, i2c-adapters numbering policy is to use N+1 for a new adapter, where N is the biggest number already use at the moment, while i2c-devs numbering policy is to use the lowest available. Why don't we just chose one common policy for both? I have no strong preference, both policies are OK, but having two names for the same thing at a given moment is a real pain. Not being able to deduce the correct i2cdetect or i2cdump command from the output of sensors will make helping users way harder, I fear. OK, I guess that I have been missing something. If it was that easy, wouldn't it have already been fixed? Thanks. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
