> I'm sorry but I'm not a system programmer. I even not a C programmer. > I've done few modification of w83627hf.c file (see attacment). So, > at now, I can load w83627hf.o module. I even see some "files" under > /proc/.../sensors/: > # ls /proc/sys/dev/sensors/w83637hf-isa-0290/ > alarms fan1 fan3 in0 in2 in4 in6 in8 pwm2 sensor2 > temp1 > temp3 vrm > beep fan2 fan_div in1 in3 in5 in7 pwm1 sensor1 sensor3 > temp2 > vid > > But I see no output from "sensors" command (I've copied a section in > sensors.conf from w83627hf section) and "sensors -s" produces errors: > # sensors > w83637hf-isa-0290 > Adapter: ISA adapter > Algorithm: ISA algorithm > # sensors -s > Error: Line 1862: Unknown feature name > .. > > So, I can be helpful only as a tester. I don't think so. You're not that far from a first result. You hacked the driver in the correct way, except that you did define a new "kind" for the w83637hf. There's nothing wrong with that, but this means that you would also have to hack the library so that it knows about that new kind. A much quicker way would be to not define that new kind, i.e. treat the 637 exactly as if it was a 627. If the chips are compatible enough, this could give interesting results (although I can't guarantee anything, I've not read the data sheet for more than 2 minutes). So I'd suggest that you hack the driver again, and only add the new device ID this time. Assign the same kind as for a 627hf, and you should start getting results from sensors. You can undo your changes to sensors.conf, BTW. Also, even if sensors doesn't work, you can "cat" the files in /proc and see if values make sense (don't forget that values may need some arithmetics applied to them as shown in sensors.conf). Let us know how it goes. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
