Jean Delvare wrote: >>I hope you're the right person to contact about this. I sent this to >>the I2C mailing list a few months ago, but got no response. >> >> > >That was the correct address. I see your previous post. Sorry we had no >time to answer then. Greg KH must know about it too. > > Not a problem. I've been using temporary IDs in the meantime (outside the kernel only). >>I'd like to request the following I2C IDs for the OVCam driver project >><http://alpha.dyndns.org/ov511/>: >> >> <snip> >One preliminary note: our authority on I2C IDs isn't unquestionable. >Sometimes people submit patches to the Linux kernel and use whatever ID >they want. It's a shame but it works. So, if someone is quicker than you >to use the following IDs, we may have to concede and have you change >your IDs. > > Understood. Not a problem. >Another note: you shouldn't expect to see any of your drivers accepted >into Linux 2.4 anymore. > > You're probably right, but I'll try anyway. It would be a shame if it didn't go in, since the already-merged W9967CF driver depends on ovcamchip. >Here we go anyway: > >#define I2C_DRIVERID_OVCAMCHIP 61 /* OmniVision CMOS image sens. */ >#define I2C_DRIVERID_TDA7313 62 /* TDA7313 audio processor */ > >#define I2C_HW_SMBUS_OV511 0x0e /* OV511(+) USB 1.1 webcam ICs */ >#define I2C_HW_SMBUS_OV518 0x0f /* OV518(+) USB 1.1 webcam ICs */ >#define I2C_HW_SMBUS_OV519 0x10 /* OV519 USB 1.1 webcam IC */ >#define I2C_HW_SMBUS_OVFX2 0x11 /* Cypress Ez-USB FX2 USB 2.0 */ > > You should change that last comment to "Cypress/OmniVision FX2 webcam", since lots of other (non-webcam) devices utilize the FX2. Anyway, the rest look good. Thanks for your assistance with this! -- Mark McClelland mark at alpha.dyndns.org
