Hi Den, On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:56:21AM +0300, Den wrote: > Hello Axell! > I'm make patch to add support lm90 and asb100 sensors into fedora > kernel. It's work fine for me on Gigabyte Ga-7vaxp (lm90 cpu sensor) > and Asus P4pe (asb100). Patch based on standart lm_sensors patch. I'm > testing this patch on 2135, 2138, 2140 and 2149 kernel, all ok. Patch > replace your lm_sensors path. I'm think, support for this modern sensors > is needed for community. > Sorry for bad english. > DenV <den at nekto.com> > (some rpms for Fedora core http://den.tourinfo.ru/pack) On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:06:10PM +0300, Den wrote: > Hello Axell! > PS. This patch is need 2 lines in configs: > CONFIG_SENSORS_ASB100=m > CONFIG_SENSORS_LM90=m > > DenV <den at nekto.com> thanks for the feedback and the testing, they are probably best to be shared with the lm_sensors list (Cced). These two drivers are built by the lm_sensors project only when doing the kernel modules build option, as they are considered experimental. lm_sensors's patching method is more conservative. In order to satisfy both conservatives and experimentalists, I provide both a kernel with the lm_sensors patch, as well as lm_sensors modules build out of the tree (but against the lm_sensors patched tree). E.g. install a matching lm_sensors-kmdl additional to the lm_sensors/i2c enebaled kernel, e.g. lm_sensors-kmdl-2.4.22-1.2140.nptl_30.rhfc1.at-2.8.2-0_19.rhfc1.at.i686.rpm for the 2.4.22-1.2140.nptl_30.rhfc1.at kernel on an i686. Could you test whether these rpms work for you? Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20040114/d9922dc7/attachment.bin
