Jean Delvare wrote: >>1499 - i2c-sis645 renamed to i2c-sis96x in kernel 2.6, any way we can >>handle this in sensors-detect? Khali or other perl guy? >> >>1503 - i2c_get_client() function in 2.4 kernels - Khali? >> >>1506 - asb100 detection - Mark? > > > I am the only one thinking that this ticket system should be canceled? > I don't think anyone but MDS reads then regularly. Half of the time we > would need more information but don't hear back from the posters, > leaving the ticket opened for months. Or the discussions ends up on the > mailing-list. I think it would be much easier for everyone that we close > the tickets system (well, leave the existing ones in place for research > purposes, but do not allow for newer tickets) and direct the users to > the mailing list. This might be the time for a more "professional" list > (I'm of course refering to the technical aspect, not the quality of > support ;)) so that Phil doesn't have to handle subscriptions by > himself. > disagree. - tickets don't get forgotten or overlooked - tickets are a real database that we control, easily searchable using tools we control (as opposed to relying on google for the mail archive) - searchable tickets allows users to help themselves and reduces traffic on mailing list - having a real bug tracking system is the essence of a "professional" project Our ticket system has problems (need more of us using it, need a method for followups); maybe something else would be better, but email-only is a big step backwards. mds
