Mark M. Hoffman wrote: >But, what about this kernel oops under 2.4? Whatever the state of the >hardware, this shouldn't happen. Could you give more details about that? >I2C and lm_sensors versions, how you built them, anything else special... >And of course a copy of the oops message itself. > > Sorry, it was my fault. I digged into this and found that lm-sensors modules had different assumptions about some "struct"s than i2c-core. The reason was that I did not use i2c-2.8.0 but i2c provided from kernel 2.4. After using the correct i2c version, the oops disappeared. Xu?n.
