> Hm, with some close look I noticed that it is 0x2d. I have no idea > what the output means, but does this look better somehow? No, no. At 0x2d there is your main chipset (ASB100 "Bach"). The W83L785TS-S is really at 0x2e. You might provide the output of "i2cdetect 1" for a full analysis of your I2C bus. > just tell me if more or other dumps will help. Please provide the output of "i2cdump 1 0x2e" anew so that I can compare with the old values. > cat /proc/sys/dev/sensors/w83l785ts-i2c-1-2e/temp > -1 40 My bad, I just chose a random register as the high limit register (well it's a typo actually). I'll fix that. That said, the exact register to use is unclear. I'll let you know when I got something for you to test. > (...) > I consider it good practice for packages that contain shared libraries > and binaries using them that they look for their own libraries under > their own prefix. It helps testing a lot, especially with several > non-distro-bundled packages or different version at the same time. > Of course, ld.so.conf does this, but systemwide for all programs, and > gets bloated when used this way. LD_LIBRARY_PATH is a bad hack and > does more harm than good if you use it like you should ld.so.conf Well, you seem to know what you're talking about. I applied your patch but it doesn't seem to do anything. The EXLDFLAGS variable is not used when I compile sensors. Are there any other steps to take? -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
