> I wonder however, would it be possible to include a refined version of > the address detection code in the module? I am willing to try to > write it myself, but I won't do it unless I know it has some remote > possibility of being included. Thanks a lot for reporting your findings. It will hopefully help some other folks someday. Here are the possibilities: 1* Add address 0x0d00 to sensors-detect. 2* Add address 0x0d00 to it87. 3* Add your code to it87. 4* Add what you found to the it87 doc. 5* Distribute your program into lm_sensors. I'm not easy with ISA chips, since I only wrote I2C chip drivers so far. I know that ISA is typically a little bit more dangerous, but I don't know to which extent. I'd like to hear other people about that. I don't even understand what you code does (or, more precisely, how it does it) but it looks interesting. Is there a chance we could use it for something less specific than your own case? (in other words, how A7N8X-VM specific is it? how it8712F-specific?) I really don't know wether it's better to just add the new address to the list, or include your detection code in some way. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
