the problem of course with using die codes for detection is that many mfrs treat it as an internal code that can change without notice. I see in the driver you allow a range for lm90 which is good. Jean Delvare wrote: > BTW, these three chips have no known die revision codes, which makes > their detection possibly unreliable. I've sent a support request on > Maxim's website but admit not to expect too much from it. I also mailed > Mary Burke at Analog Devices, maybe she'll be able to provide the > revision code values for the ADM1032.
