Hi, On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 07:24:02PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Another thing I'm thinking of, back to the initial problem, is that we > could make the script detect where sensors is (we already do for device > files, modules.conf and dmidecode) so that the script works whatever the > configuration. In this case, you wouldn't have to do anything special on > your side (and, even, doing something could harmlessly break the > script). > > Any opinion? This sounds a bit like an autoconf task. It would mean converting the lm_sensors checks into m4 chuncks, which probably isn't worth while for only defining the installation prefix. -- Axel.Thimm at physik.fu-berlin.de -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20030824/4bdc76eb/attachment.bin
