On 2003-08-23 21:23:03, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I don't have applied the GRSEC patch to my kernel (I've downloaded > > the kernel source from kernel.org). > > > > I upgraded to 2.8.0 (after removing ALL 2.7.0 remains), but the error > > is still there. > > OK, so the problem is still there :( I thought it was fixed. > > Why do you have the adm1021 module loaded? Doesn't seem to be used. Has > sensors-detect been suggesting you should load it? Likewise, I don't > think i2c-viapro is used (unless you partly hid the output of sensors). > Does unloading all (i2c-related) modules and reload only the ones you > need solve your problem? (unlikely) Yes, sensors-detect has suggested it ... here is my /etc/modules (after running sensors-detect 2.8.0): --- snip --- # I2C adapter drivers i2c-viapro i2c-isa # I2C chip drivers adm1021 eeprom w83781d --- snip --- I don't know if viapro is used, but it's in the "i2c-core" list # lsmod | grep i2c i2c-proc 6644 1 [w83781d eeprom adm1021] i2c-isa 724 0 (unused) i2c-viapro 3468 0 (unused) i2c-core 15556 0 [w83781d eeprom adm1021 i2c-proc i2c-isa i2c-viapro] > Could you try writing to the files by yourself? For example, move to > /proc/sys/dev/sensors/w83697hf-isa-0290 and do: > echo "50 60" > temp1 > Then read back the values from temp1. Does it work? yes, it works! # echo "30 40" > temp1 # cat temp1 30.0 40.0 32.0 # echo "50 60" > temp1 # cat temp1 50.0 60.0 32.0 > In your original ticket, you wrote: > > cd /proc/sys/dev/sensors > > cat chips > 256 w83697hf-isa-029 > > Is it really "w83697hf-isa-029" or is the trailing "0" missing in your > copy only? yes, it's "w83697hf-isa-0290", I forgot the trailing "0" ... sorry # cat /proc/sys/dev/sensors/chips 256 eeprom-i2c-0-50 257 w83697hf-isa-0290 > I hope we'll find a solution. Thank you for your efforts! (and sorry for my bad English :-) ) -- cu, Johannes Wei?l
