> btw, if you update the detection to also check for 65 as version > number you support the EMC6D102, I have not found any diffrences > myself in the sheets. Two things I found in our lm85 drivers: 1* It seems that the EMC6D10x has 3 more voltage inputs than the LM85. We have the following specific defines for the EMC6D10x: #define EMC6D100_REG_SFR 0x7c #define EMC6D100_REG_ALARM3 0x7d #define EMC6D100_REG_CONF 0x7f #define EMC6D100_REG_INT_EN 0x80 /* IN5, IN6 and IN7 */ #define EMC6D100_REG_IN(nr) (0x70 + ((nr)-5)) #define EMC6D100_REG_IN_MIN(nr) (0x73 + ((nr)-5) * 2) #define EMC6D100_REG_IN_MAX(nr) (0x74 + ((nr)-5) * 2) We don't use _SFR, _CONF nor _INT_EN in our code as far as I could see. 2* Interesting comment: "Unfortunately, we can't tell a '100 from a '101 from the registers. Since a '101 is a '100 in a package with fewer pins and therefore no 3.3V, 1.5V or 1.8V inputs, perhaps if those inputs read 0, then it's a '101." Well, I guess you'd have find all that in the datasheet anyway, but now you know how we do handle these chips. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
