Dne ne 27. ?ervence 2003 23:34 jste napsal(a): > > > Not bad, but it's not perfect yet. VCCP is bad (I don't know what it > > > is) and +12V is very bad too. The temperatures look correct. > > > > I know, what I "needed" was CPU temperature. > > Temperatures are really correct, memory (+2.5), +3.3V, +5.5V too. > > > > IMHO VCCP looks like "CPU Core (+1.5 V)" from intel Active Monitor > > > > Nominal Value 1,500 > > Current Value 1,447 > > Upper Threshold 2,300 > > Lower Threshold 0,700. > > These guys are crazy. They accept a deviation of over 50% on VCore. We > tolerate 5%... ;-), intel is sometime interesting. > > value "+12V" isn't in Active Monitor, maybe simply isn't(?) on my > > chip. > > I read the datasheet and this one is tricky. The pin that reports +12V > is shared with another function, so depending on how your chip is > hardwired, you have +12V or not. Obviously you don't have it. Our driver > doesn't support this possibility yet. This may also explain your wrong > limits for VCCP, but I'd like you to try some things to be sure. > > I suspect you have an old config file at /etc/sensors.conf, with no > section for the adm1025. If I'm right, you should copy the new one > (etc/sensors.conf.eg from lm_sensors-2.8.0) to /etc/sensors.conf, run > "sensors -s" and run "sensors" again. You should at least see VCCP > labeled VCore. Maybe the limits will change too. Please let me know what > they are. OK, I did it. Now, line with VCCP is VCore: +1.46 V (min = +1.40 V, max = +1.55 V). > In the meantime, I'll fix our driver to support your configuration. I > have an idea on how to do that, I'll think of it while sleeping. great :o) > BTW, is the data at address Ox44 on your I2C bus still the same? ;) Just > curious. you think this magic line? 00: 00 00 0f 3f 00 00 02 00 50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 It's constantly. I tested something and after 2-3 reboots looks this line still same, so maybe you have new fun ... good night ... -- Ondrej Cecak
