> Sorry for the delay, I got busy with some other work... Same here as you can see. > Ok they are different I attach both files... but here are the juicy > bits... > > With UTF on.. > Probing for `ITE IT8705F / IT8712F / SiS 950' > Trying address 0x0290... > ite_isa_detect called with chip = 0 and addr = 656 > val = 144 > val = 88 > calling outb with addr = 661 and val = 167 > In the if block > Failed! > > With UTF off... > Probing for `ITE IT8705F / IT8712F / SiS 950' > Trying address 0x0290... > ite_isa_detect called with chip = 0 and addr = 656 > val = 255 > val = 79 > calling outb with addr = 661 and val = 176 > after return #1 > after return #2 > Success! > (confidence 8, driver `it87') All right. I think that everyone will now agree that the problem is *not* in outb but in *inb*. Time to try another set of prints. Please grab the new sensors-detect at: http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/sensors-detect-k2 and give it a try. As usual, all the interest is to compare the output between a UTF and a non-UTF locale. It will probably generate more noise than the previous one did. I expect to see that on your system, ord($X) and unpack("C", $X) give different results (while I think both functions should return the same value in all cases, on all systems). -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
