would you please send us the entire output of 'make' so we can clean up the warnings. Thanks. Ishikawa wrote: > "Mark D. Studebaker" wrote: > >>thanks for the report. >>We've already attempted to fix things in CVS. >>Would you please try it for us using gcc 3.3. >>There's a link on our home page (May 31st entry) >>to the new makefile and the file etc/config.c, which is also needed. >> > > > Thank you for your quick response. > > I downloaded the Makefile and etc/config.c > and retried compiling lm_sensors 2.7.0 using gcc 3.3. > > Well, the compilation produced lots of warnings > about system headers (now used CC options include -Wall), but > the compilation succeeded! > > I looked at the difference in Makefile. > Obviously the use of -nostdinc on the gcc command line, > and specifying the necessary header directories in correct/desired > order explicitly using -I helped. > (Actually I played with -nostdinc when I encountered the problem, > but I didn't know the "-print-search-dirs" directive to GCC. So > I could not figure out where GCC would be searching for the > standard headers in GCC's default scheme. There I gave up, > and decided to use the different directory for i2c headers in > my suggested patch.) > > Thank you again for your great piece of software! > > Happy Hacking > > PS: maybe your entry dated May 31st might want to mention > gcc 3.3 (or gcc 3.x) since I obviously missed > this entry when I checked your web page yesterday... > > Ishikawa, Chiaki >
