Jean Delvare wrote: > Fred, > > Thanks a lot for your report! I was wondering which of ACPI and DMI > detection methods was the best, that's why I placed this request in our > detection script, that appears if both method succeed but don't give the > same answer. It seems that on your system, the DMI method gives a more > interesting result than the ACPI one. [snip] > If you are wanting to try anyway, just let us known and we'll tell you > how to bypass the security mechanism. Of course, we won't be responsible > if anything bad happens then. If you succeed, you'll be a hero and we'll > add you name in the credits ;) Well, sounds much like Mission: > Impossible, isn't it. The good thing if you try and succeed is that we > could then let people having the same laptop as you run lm_sensors. > > So, just let us know if you want to dive in. I think I'll put a lid on my curiousness and keep my laptop as it is :-) However, I am still interested in getting the module working for our servers and when/if I get this working (or if I don't) I'll let you know. Thanks! Fred
