Unless there's objections let's put this off until after the release. Philip Pokorny wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > >>>> Doesn't it mean that HEAD should become lk2-5 or old or obsolete or >>>> whatever, and lk2-4 should become HEAD again? >>> >>> >>> is that possible? >> >> >> >> I don't know. I'm no CVS expert, I just feel we *should* be able to do >> so. I was actually told a few minutes ago that it wasn't easily >> feasable... :( >> > > You should be able to make this happen forceably, by checking out the > HEAD then replacing the file tree with the files from a lk2-5 or lk2-4 > tree and then checking the result back into the HEAD. > > It's low-tech, but it should work... >
