I'd like to solicit volunteers to create a 2.6-compatible libsensors right away. I don't think we can wait until 2.6.0 comes out to get started. Anybody up for it? Can we put a request on our web page? What do you guys think? Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 10:12:08AM -0700, Philip Pokorny wrote: > >>I'm worried about the libsensors implementation for 2.5/2.6. The switch to >>sysfs will mean a radical change to the libsensors implementation. This >>may be a good time to address a number of issues (duplicated code in >>libsensors and prog/sensors, inflexible formating, integration of >>sensord/rrdb, etc) if we have to do a major re-write of the libsensors and >>sensors code. Has anyone given any thought to this? > > > I've looked at this, and agree, a radical change to the libsensors > implementation seems to be in order. I haven't spent any serious time > yet on this, but will have the time after 2.6.0 comes out. >
