On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 23:54, Greg KH wrote: > Hm, this patch looks backwards, is it? > > Also, just as a side note, can you make your patches so that they can be > applied with "patch -p1" instead of "patch -p0" which your current ones > are? My tools treat -p1 patches much better :) > Ok, here is the proper one. To recap: I did the w83781d sysfs update as per the old spec, which was not milli-volt. This patch should fix it. Regards, -- Martin Schlemmer -------------- next part -------------- --- 1/drivers/i2c/chips/w83781d.c 2003-04-07 22:53:37.000000000 +0200 +++ 2/drivers/i2c/chips/w83781d.c 2003-04-07 22:53:34.000000000 +0200 @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ \ w83781d_update_client(client); \ \ - return sprintf(buf,"%ld\n", (long)IN_FROM_REG(data->reg[nr])); \ + return sprintf(buf,"%ld\n", (long)IN_FROM_REG(data->reg[nr] * 10)); \ } show_in_reg(in); show_in_reg(in_min); @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ u32 val; \ \ val = simple_strtoul(buf, NULL, 10); \ - data->in_##reg[nr] = IN_TO_REG(val); \ + data->in_##reg[nr] = (IN_TO_REG(val) / 10); \ w83781d_write_value(client, W83781D_REG_IN_##REG(nr), data->in_##reg[nr]); \ \ return count; \ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20030409/0731269c/attachment.bin
