On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 23:54, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 11:16:03PM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > > --- drivers/i2c/chips/w83781d.c.orig 2003-04-07 22:53:37.000000000 +0200 > > +++ drivers/i2c/chips/w83781d.c 2003-04-07 22:53:34.000000000 +0200 > > @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ > > \ > > w83781d_update_client(client); \ > > \ > > - return sprintf(buf,"%ld\n", (long)IN_FROM_REG(data->reg[nr] * 10)); \ > > + return sprintf(buf,"%ld\n", (long)IN_FROM_REG(data->reg[nr])); \ > > Hm, this patch looks backwards, is it? > > Also, just as a side note, can you make your patches so that they can be > applied with "patch -p1" instead of "patch -p0" which your current ones > are? My tools treat -p1 patches much better :) > Yes, sorry, that is reverse. I have to go to work in a bit, so if you need me to resend tonight, just ask. -- Martin Schlemmer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/attachments/20030408/e0e78113/attachment.bin
