On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:06:06AM -0500, Albert Cranford wrote: > Your right, nobody outside of sensors uses i2c-proc, but > why not create a new i2c-sysfs.h in drivers/i2c locally > and and adjust the couple of existing drivers. What would i2c-sysfs.h be needed for? All of the needed sysfs prototype functions are already in device.h. > We all know the application library is not going to have > access to include/linux/include/i2c-xxxx.h anyhow. It never did :) > Later we can completely remove linux/include/linux/i2c-proc.h > which the existing application library relies upon. No userspace program should rely on kernel header files. And I didn't take away the functionality that i2c-proc.h provided with the list of devices supported and such. Just the unused function prototypes that dealt with the proc and sysctl interface. thanks, greg k-h
