On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 07:40:26PM +0100, Jan Dittmer wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >That would give us one value per file, use no floating point in the > >kernel (fake or not) and generally make things a whole lot more orderly. > >Also, if a sensor does not have a max value (for example, I don't really > >know if this is true), instead of having to fake a value, it can just > >not create the file. Then userspace can easily detect this is not > >supported, and is not a placeholder value. > > > > Is this the way you want to go? Just an example for the voltages. That looks very good to me, nice job. Sensors developers, does this look sane? > Btw, is it indended behaviour of sysfs, that after writing to a file, > the size is zero? Hm, don't know about that, I haven't seen that before. If you cat the file after writing it, does the file size change? thanks, greg k-h
