Is this a bug in i2c-philips-par.c?

[mds at paradyne.com (Mark D. Studebaker )]

- it does not appear to be a bug;
- the code has been rewritten in CVS anyway

David wrote:
> Can someone check if this is a bug and apply diff as necessary.
> 
> Looks like it would only affect people of kernels prior to 2.3.4
> 
> Normal cavets apply.
> 
> 1)	I am not a programmer
> 2)	I barely know C
> 3)	Consider yourself warned.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 289,290c289,290
> < 	for (port = parport_enumerate(); port; port=port->next)
> < 		i2c_parport_detach(port);
> ---
> 
>>	for (port = parport_enumerate(); port; port=port->next);
>>	i2c_parport_detach(port);