Thank you, Mark! I'm not sure if you got the number I want to add - the OMAHA listing was an example i took from the linux-arm code. The number i wanted to add is given below (and is also included in a patch against linux-2.4.19-rmk5 (and 6) on the arm-linux maintenance site). Please add it in if this isn't the number you added. (the omaha one is also valid, but i don't maintain it) #define I2C_HW_B_GUIDE 0x15 /* Guide bit-basher */ thanks, cam ps. Do you know where Simon Vogel went? Has he disappeared? On Sunday 16 February 2003 18:36, Mark D. Studebaker wrote: > I checked your ID into i2c CVS. > It will eventually get submitted to the kernel or feel free to include it > in one of your patches. mds > > Frodo Looijaard wrote: > > Cam Mayor wrote: > >>From cmayor at iders.ca Wed Jan 29 01:25:05 2003 [headers snip] > > > > After lots of digging, I found a lead to the answer to where to find an > > answer in the place i should have looked but didn't remember - the > > MAINTAINERS file. > > > > Simon, Frodo, do you have an opinion on where i should submit the > > following: > > > > On Tuesday 28 January 2003 17:34, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >>On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 05:22:17PM -0600, Cam Mayor wrote: > >>>In the file ./include/linux/i2c-id.h > >>>there is a list of bit-algorithm adapters and their associated > >>> sequential numbers. > >>>eg. > >>> #define I2C_HW_B_OMAHA 0x14 /* Omaha I2C interface > >>>*/ > >>> > >>>Are the numbers allocated in a first-come-first-serve (or > >>>first-to-propagate-patch-gets-it), or are they allocated in a more > >>>bureaucratic way? I see nothing listed in ./Documentation/i2c about > >>>this, and i wish to add our hardware to the list. > >> > >>I have no idea; there appears to be no documented method for these IDs. > > > > I suspect this device will only be used for ARM linux, as it is > > bit-bashed from an ARM processor. However, i don't want to have to > > continually be patching the device number. > > > > Russell, it looks like at least two of these allocations are present in > > the 2.4.19-rmk5 patch, so perhaps i should just submit this patch to you. > > > > I've added the two I2C maintainers to the mail to see if they have an > > opinion on whether i should submit the one-line patch to them or to > > submit it with the rest of the i2c code that i'm going to submit to the > > -rmk tree. > > > > cheers, > > cam -- Cameron Mayor Iders Incorporated 600A Clifton Street Winnipeg, MB Canada R3G 2X6 http://www.iders.ca tel: 204-779-5400 ext 29 fax: 204-779-5444 Legalese some customers need us to state for the record: This message is intended solely for the use of the designated recipient(s) and their appointed delegates, and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying or distribution of its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please destroy it and advise the sender immediately by phone, email or facsimile.
