Hi, > Have you looked at doc/developers/new-drivers? > I would like the /proc names to be standard. > If you plan on continuing to work on it, I can do the initial checkin > and you can request CVS access, or send me patches... > Or if you are making changes soon I can wait. > Which would you prefer? Mark - Yep, I used these names so that my grey cells didn't get confused looking at the proc entries :-) I know that they have to be changed :-) I'm still looking at what we can get out of all these registers. Give me another week to get this in some sort of shape. There are a couple of things that Intel seem to have changed :-( Can you E-Mail your E-address to margitsw at t-online.de and, as soon as I have something that's compatible, I'll send it. I'd prefer to get the driver to 90% complete before we shove it into CVS. Two things : 1) Can you reserve an I2C device Id (and E me) 2) Do I have to dig through the sensors and related progs myself or can somebody take that over ? sensors-detect just needs the trivial change from driver => "Unwritten: lm85", to driver => "lm85", Should have mentioned in my original mail that I'm using 2.7.0 Cheers Margit
