Jean Delvare wrote: > I don't know about the adm1021 module. What would it cost not to use the > SENSORS_INSMOD_8 thing? > It was added for mc1066 support in adm1021. The only way around it is to combine support for some of the 8 different chips and report only 7 different chip types max. > I don't think we have to care about the dependency issue. 15 months is > really much, there were many fixes to i2c since, and having people > upgrade can't hurt. If for any reason they don't want to, 2.6.3 to 2.6.5 > are working for almost everyone (at least, one of these is working for > each one). > > Does 2.7.0 mean "developement/unstable tree" for you? I think it will > sound like that for almost everyone, including me. And if this means > less support issues, it also means less feedback IMHO, so it's worth > discussing. > Doesn't mean unstable to me. We don't use the odd/even system, we've been stable for years :)
